I started this article some time ago, before my recent blogging hiatus. Last summer, I became a married man, and in the process learned a lot about how to plan an event and keep costs down. Weddings are generally big, expensive affairs. Weddingbells magazine reports that on average, Canadians expect to spend $19,274 on their big day. In my experience, once you commit to spending such a large amount of money, a few extra dollars here and there to get what you want are easily justified so I'm going to go out on a limb and say that most people spend more than they expect to on their wedding. I know I did.

But it doesn't have to be expensive. Though I did spend more than I expected, not only did my wedding cost only a fraction of the typical $20k, but factoring in cash gifts received - which were entirely unsolicited - it actually turned a decent profit. There are two sides of the equation to turning a profit on your wedding, as with any event - revenue and expenses. While I highly recommend inviting any wealthy and generous relatives that you might have to increase your gift count, the reality is that you don't have a lot of control over the income side of the equation. But you can still keep your costs to a minimum without sacrificing the beauty of the day. Such cost savings can take the extreme case, as chronicled in The $2000 Wedding, but in our case we put on a relatively typical wedding while keeping the cost to around $6000. How we did it:

Avoid the wedding industry

Businesses that are dedicated solely to weddings tend to overcharge. Even businesses that only do a few wedding things will often raise prices if they know you're inquiring about a wedding. The biggest offenders are clothing, flowers, cakes and most of all hotels. Before visiting a wedding dress shop, try a few ordinary dress shops. We found an absolutely gorgeous dress for my wife on sale for $270 at the tail end of grad season...the same dress was also available in white for traditionalists, no difference in price. Venues are an even bigger cost issue. The Weddingbells poll claims that most couples expect to spend almost $8000 on their reception venue. Even if this includes food, it's absurd.

Community halls can be excellent venues for a wedding, if you hunt around for one that you like. Ours was just lovely and cost all of $400. The catering was extra, of course, and by hunting around we found a caterer that charged about half what the big local names charge, and would give us the menu we wanted. The key - he's new in the business, having just graduated from the food program at a local college about 3 years ago. In things like catering, increased experience and name recognition does mean higher prices, but not necessarily higher quality.

The cake was, I think, our best accomplishment. A coworker who was planning her wedding at the same time was unable to get her cost below $400. For half that, we got ice cream cake. It was good. The only downside was a limited display time for the cake, but this disadvantage was more than made up for by tasting really, really good.

Do it yourself

With the amount of organising that goes into a wedding it's tempting to hire a professional wedding planner to take the load off. In terms of cost, it's not so much the cost of the planner - they are, after all, a value added service - but the type of wedding that they steer you towards. They do a lot of these, and so the businesses they deal with are in the wedding industry, and charge accordingly. Another reason we opted against the planner was because friends we talked to found that the planner didn't reduce their stress...they just moved the stress to increasingly trivial things. One cousin reported spending days going back and forth about whether to have a matte or satin finish on the napkins. Nobody even asked us that question.

Doing it yourself also applies to invitations, flowers, and decorations. If you're having a summer wedding, consider growing your own flowers. Instead of dropping $800-$1000 on flowers, we spent $90 on bedding plants, seeds, and planters in the spring, and by the time our wedding rolled around these looked at least as good as anything a florist could have provided. $20 worth of decorative paper and some borrowed craft and stamping supplies gave us some beautiful invitations, a far cry from the hundreds that the people ahead of me in line at the paper store were spending to have theirs printed. Additionally, I could have run theirs off my printer, whereas ours were more personal.

Keep it simple, keep it small

There's a law of diminishing returns when it comes to inviting a lot of guests. And I'm not just talking about gifts, though of course more distant relations are unlikely to pull their weight there either. Mostly the problem with inviting a lot of people is that you don't have time to talk to any of them, making the day even more hectic than it already is. More guests increases the cost, and reduces the intimacy of your wedding...do you really want that? My wife and I faced a fair bit of pressure to invite relatives that we don't really know, and sometimes we gave in so as to balance things (I was inviting all my cousins, so Kathy needed to as well), but when my father wanted me to invite some of his cousins that I might exchange pleasantries with once every year or two, that was going too far.

Of the 120 people we invited, about sixty people turned out, pretty much in line with what the wedding planning literature told us to expect. Those 60 people were more than enough, as I'm still not sure I managed to even say hello to everybody, let alone have a real conversation.

As for simplicity - you don't need the fanciest room for your reception - a community hall will do. If you're religious, the ceremony venue is often free or "by donation," if you're not, a wedding in a park can be reasonably cost effective, or the same community hall can be used for the ceremony. The city here charged us $35/hour for a park site reservation. Total venue cost for the whole day: $620.

Reuseability

This doesn't lower the cost of your wedding, but it does increase its long term value. It's simple - buy things that you'll use again. I bought my last suit when I was 18...it didn't fit me anymore. So instead of spending a bunch of money on a rental tux, I bought a suit that will be useful in the future for job interviews and other people's weddings. The same applies to the dress, though I'm not sure what kind of occasion will call for a formal dress, we now own one. Our flower pots will be used again next year. So all these things which we justified buying because they were for the wedding have added value to our lives every other day.

You can also save money by reusing. My suit was bought second hand. Now I have an Armani suit, and it didn't break the bank. For smaller things, the waste management department in our city has a reuse centre, where certain types of "junk" can be brought and then picked up by other people. They supplied the vases for our cut flowers, some of our invitation supplies, and possibly some other things that I've forgotten about. You might think this is cheap, but I don't think any of our guests knew where they came. Except for the friend who volunteers there, and saved us the $2 pickup fee.

Call in Favours

Instead of paying for a DJ, our music was supplied by a friend who could borrow the equipment from his employer at no cost. A friend of my mother's handled the photography in return for $50 and dinner. He's not the most artistic photographer in the world, but he's got all the equipment, and the colour and vibrancy of the pictures came out better than anything an true amateur could have done. We did look at several professional, artistic photographers, and while many could produce stunning results, I do not think they are worth several thousand dollars. The one we liked the best would have charged $7000, more than doubling the cost of the wedding.

Budget, budget, budget

As with anything, decide in advance how much it's worth to you, and then find a way to get what you want for the price you're willing to pay. Be reasonable...if you plan to invite 500 people, you can't reasonably expect to spend $4000. But consider whether there's really 500 people that you like well enough to buy them dinner. Break down your budget into categories, so that you have an idea of your target in each one. That way every step of the way, you'll be able to see whether each item is over or under budget. The largest items are venues, catering and clothing, which together ate up about $4000. We could have reduced catering costs either by going with a more typical roast beef or turkey dinner, or by opting for disposable plates and cups. Neither one reflected how we wanted to remember our wedding, and so we spent the money to arrange a custom menu and rent real plates and glasses.

The rules of wedding planning are no different from the rules you should be applying to any other purchase. Always make sure you get value for your money by refusing to pay more than you feel something is worth. It can be more expensive than you expected, but if it's more expensive than it is worth then it is not worth having at all.

Amongst the top three expenditures in most North American households is the automobile. Despite my previously mentioned love for bicycles, my wife and I also own a car, and it's lately been weighing on me as a large cost. Well, today specifically since I got nailed with a $900 repair bill. And I still need to replace the tires, which looks like it will run me at least another $500.

As someone active in the cycling community, I have a number of car free friends, and I do sometimes wonder whether this might be a realistic option for me. While I'm not in the mood to figure out all the costs involved, it is valuable to contemplate the alternatives. My current car use is pretty minimal...the car remains parked 4-5 days per week, and much of the time when it does get used, it is only slightly more convenient. Alternatives to car ownership are usually not entirely adequate by themselves, but a combination could save a lot of money without any meaningful deterioration in quality of life.

Rental Cars

For someone who drives infrequently - and mostly on weekends - rental cars are actually a very efficient use of money. Renting a car on the weekend often costs only about $20-$30 per day. This is usually how I get myself to the airport, being much cheaper than parking there, or taking a cab. While a weekly car rental would no doubt be a hassle, I could rent a car three Saturdays every month to run my errands without spending more than my current insurance bill. Without even taking into account the capital investment in the car, or revenue from renting out my parking stall, I'm coming out even.

We also take occasional weekend trips out of town, which, at $100/weekend would take 160 weekends (or once a month for 13 years) before it would cost as much as buying a low-end car. Since we would like to replace our car roughly every 10 years, if these are the only two times we actually need a car, then renting is coming out ahead.

Bicycle

For an urban resident, the bicycle is a very practical vehicle. Cheap to buy, cheap to maintain, free to park at most venues, and often - thanks to avoiding traffic congestion - they can get places in a similar amount of time to a car. The capital cost of a decent bike is anywhere from $500-$1500, depending on your definition of decent. In other words for the amount that just spent fixing my car, I could have bought a new bike.

Winter is usually the biggest hurdle to biking, and I think this might be the downfall of my plan. While I've biked a bit this winter, it's much less fun than summer biking, so having to bike everywhere might cramp my style. That said, many people bike year-round here, and since the main hurdle is willpower, being forced to might make the difference.

Public Transit

Public transit is particularly useful for trips that go to central locations, such as a downtown job or school at a major university. Given the cost of parking at these locations, I already use transit for those sorts of trips, so owning or not owning a car makes no difference.

I think there's little doubt that we could save a lot of money by selling our car and living car-free. But the lifestyle adjustment is a bit frightening, so it probably won't happen. It's something to consider, though, if you ever find yourself having to adapt to a lower income, or if you're having trouble staying on top of your bills.

The received wisdom of personal finance bloggers and other "experts" is that part of good money management is to have an emergency fund consisting of enough money to get you through 3-6 months with no income. This, to me, does not make sense as good advice to give someone who is paying off revolving debt, especially credit card debt or anything else with similarly high interest. Why do I think this is a bad idea? Simple:
You are borrowing your emergency fund.

Taken by Brad Noble on June 29, 2009.

Between getting married and working on an article about how to get married without breaking the bank, I've missed the past couple of deadlines. Bad Neil Bad! So tonight, since my wedding article isn't ready yet, a quick one about this year's one-time only home renovation tax credit.

Most Canadians have probably encountered some ad or another trumpeting this tax credit. The basics of it are that any renovation work done on your home qualifies for a federal tax credit - this could bring up to $1350 back into your pocket. I was looking into this as it may be an incentive to get my act together on replacing some doors and window coverings around the house that I've been thinking need to be done.

Articles and blogs about saving money like to point out ways we "waste money." Money is only wasted when you don't make a conscious decision to spend it. Everything else is about getting value for your money. Maybe a pair of jeans really is worth $200 to you? The problem is that value is such a subjective concept, it's kind of hard to blog about, so it doesn't get much digital ink.

How do you decide value? Well, it's really an art form, there aren't really set rules.

Comparison Shopping

First things first - compare to other options. This is the basic shopping around approach. If you can buy the exact same product through a different retailer, and the price is lower, then all else being equal the more expensive one is poor value. But other things are rarely equal. The cheaper store may be further away, thus requiring extra investment of time and fuel to get the discount. In some cases, you may place higher value on supporting local business, so you're willing to pay more knowing that the staff are higher paid and the profit will stay in your community. You may have ethical issues with how the prices are lowered in the cheaper stores - I refuse to shop at Walmart because of how their treat their employees and suppliers. It's hard to put a dollar value on these things, but they are important factors in getting value for your money.

Quality

Then there's quality questions. I'm currently looking into an all-inclusive vacation for my upcoming honeymoon. It'll be the first one I've ever taken, so I'm spending a lot of time determining what's worth paying for and what's really important to me. The cheapest options are in Cancun or Varadero, both massively built up resort areas where I'd be unlikely to see a local person who is not employed by the hotel. But smaller resort areas - where there are maybe a half dozen hotels at most - are only a couple hundred dollars more, which is probably worth it to me. Likewise, I'm willing to pay more for adult-only, smaller number of rooms, and good snorkeling access. All of these things increase the quality of the product, and so are worth extra money.

With physical purchases, quality is often less subjective. A department store bike sold for $100-$300 won't stand up to the amount of riding a $800 bike will. If you ride regularly, it's likely the department store bike will have to be replaced every year or two, whereas the expensive bike should last a decade or more. This makes the direct financial cost of a cheap bike higher than an expensive bike, so long as you're going to use it. The same thing comes into play when buying computers, power tools or clothing - going cheap now usually means having to replace it sooner. Even food...it costs more to shop at the farmers market, but fresh produce picked ripe tastes better than commercial produce picked 2 weeks ago and shipped. That's worth something.

Where it fits

What's this purchase going to do for you. This is the biggest, and most subjective value calculation. If you're buying something that you're going to use a lot for years to come, spending thousands of dollars isn't unreasonable. But if you're replacing say, an old car, the calculation isn't so clear. What do you get out of buying the new car? Is what you get worth the price you're paying?

I can't make that decision for you, and neither should any other blogger. The end message of this post is that to make the decision, don't just spend the money blindly.

For American readers - this article deals with Canadian retirement savings vehicles. The same broad principles apply to the Roth vs Traditional debate, but the specifics of tax law are, naturally, different.

This year, the government of Canada added a new type of savings account to the arsenal of ways to reduce - or at least manage - your taxes. The Tax Free Savings Account lets you deposit up to $5000 per year and enjoy the full benefits of your investment growth, no taxes to pay. Having more options is usually a good thing, and this is no exception, but there's a lot of confusion about whether this is a better or worse option than putting your savings in an RRSP. This being investing we're talking about, there's not going to be a right and wrong answer. It all depends on your situation. So with that, a summary below on how to choose.

A recent comment on popular personal finance blog, Bad Money Advice, got me thinking about the many seemingly sensible things that are nonetheless false. This particular comment advises using incandescent bulbs in winter to save on your heating bill - by increasing your electricity bill.

Incandescent bulbs are not efficient at lighting, but they are very very efficient heaters. And since they heat surfaces instead of the air, they are actually more efficient than many other kinds of heaters.

Every been skiing when its 20 degrees, but you feel warm because the sun in shining brightly? Its a bit like that…

CFLs are fine in the summer… but in the winter replace them with incandescent bulbs to reduce overall electricity consumption.

The premise - that using compact fluorescent lights that efficiently turn electricity into light will increase your heating bill during cold weather - is probably on some level right. We are reducing the total heat generated through non-furnace means in the house. But the question here is whether the increased costs in heating outweigh the decreased costs in electricity.

The bicycle is a beautiful thing. It's the single most energy efficient form of transportation ever invented. It can take you across town in a similar amount of time to a car (factoring in that the car will spend much of the trip stopped in traffic), and provide the exercise that most people are lacking in their daily lives. I ride mine every weekday in the summer - my target is commuting 5 days per week for 6 months, and 3 days per week for another 3 months - and I love it. But I've found that buying cycling gear has been getting expensive. So I've been wondering, is this form of commuting actually saving me money.

You spent $150 on WHAT!

One part of my job is processing expenses for employees of my company. As some people work from home, they'll send in their internet bill for reimbursement, which is often the same as their cable bill. I'm stunned when I see the numbers. Some bills, once you add up the premium cable package and the pay per view, can run $150 per month, not including the internet. As someone who might spend an average $10 or $15 in a month on TV, this seems pretty much unbelievable. I haven't had cable for years, and I don't miss it.

Here's my reasoning why. I was already paying for high speed internet, the purveyor of nearly unlimited entertainment at minimal cost. My cable bill was about $50/month, half of that because the only channel that I felt was worth having - Discovery - was in a premium package. I found I wasn't watching much, mostly Mythbusters, and reruns of That '70s Show that were on while I was cooking dinner. It just didn't seem like $50 worth of entertainment in a month.

Of course, I still like to watch TV sometimes, but I can get that from the internet, too. I'm not talking about illegal downloads, but cheap or free sources of commercial TV shows and movies that are completely above board.